The phrase represents potential legislative or regulatory adjustments impacting the monetary sector, presumably enacted throughout or following a future presidential administration. This might contain deregulation, revisions to current banking rules like Dodd-Frank, or the introduction of recent statutes addressing rising monetary applied sciences and market practices. For instance, the phrase may discuss with revised capital necessities for monetary establishments or altered client safety legal guidelines associated to lending.
Such alterations to the regulatory framework for banks have important implications for the steadiness of the monetary system, the provision of credit score, and the general economic system. Traditionally, adjustments in banking rules have led to durations of each financial development and monetary instability. Understanding the character and scope of those potential adjustments is essential for monetary establishments, buyers, and customers alike, because it permits them to anticipate and adapt to the evolving panorama.
The next sections will delve into the potential areas of focus for banking laws, the anticipated results on numerous stakeholders, and the broader financial issues related to any important adjustments to banking rules.
1. Deregulation potentialities
Deregulation of the banking sector represents a possible point of interest inside the framework of attainable “trump new financial institution legal guidelines 2025”. It encompasses the discount or elimination of current rules that govern banking actions, aiming to foster competitors and effectivity. Nonetheless, deregulation additionally carries inherent dangers, together with elevated monetary instability and potential for extreme risk-taking by monetary establishments.
-
Easing of Capital Necessities
Enjoyable the capital adequacy ratios mandated for banks may very well be a key factor of deregulation. Decrease capital necessities could allow banks to extend lending and funding actions, doubtlessly stimulating financial development. Nonetheless, decreased capital buffers additionally make banks extra weak to losses throughout financial downturns, growing the danger of failure and systemic instability. For instance, the comfort of capital necessities previous the 2008 monetary disaster contributed to extreme risk-taking within the mortgage market.
-
Decreased Oversight and Supervision
A deregulatory method might contain diminishing the frequency and depth of regulatory oversight by businesses such because the Federal Reserve or the FDIC. This might grant banks larger autonomy of their operations, doubtlessly resulting in innovation and effectivity features. Nonetheless, diminished oversight might also create alternatives for regulatory arbitrage and the concealment of dangerous practices, in the end undermining the steadiness of the monetary system.
-
Loosening of Lending Restrictions
Deregulation might entail the elimination or modification of restrictions on particular varieties of lending, equivalent to mortgage lending or lending to sure industries. This might broaden entry to credit score for debtors and companies, selling financial exercise. Nonetheless, loosening lending restrictions might also lead to a decline in lending requirements, resulting in elevated defaults and potential monetary instability, notably in sectors susceptible to speculative bubbles.
-
Rollback of Dodd-Frank Act Provisions
A possible deregulatory effort might goal particular provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act, a complete monetary regulatory reform enacted in response to the 2008 monetary disaster. This might embrace easing restrictions on proprietary buying and selling by banks (the Volcker Rule), lowering the regulatory burden on group banks, or weakening the oversight of systemically necessary monetary establishments (SIFIs). Whereas these adjustments might scale back compliance prices and doubtlessly enhance financial institution profitability, additionally they threat weakening the safeguards designed to stop future monetary crises.
Within the context of attainable “trump new financial institution legal guidelines 2025”, the extent and nature of deregulation will considerably form the monetary panorama. The potential advantages of elevated effectivity and financial development should be rigorously weighed in opposition to the dangers of heightened monetary instability and the potential for future crises. The steadiness struck between these competing issues may have profound implications for the steadiness and prosperity of the U.S. economic system.
2. Capital requirement shifts
Capital requirement shifts characterize a doubtlessly major factor of any future “trump new financial institution legal guidelines 2025.” These necessities, which dictate the quantity of capital banks should maintain relative to their belongings, function a vital buffer in opposition to losses and are elementary to the steadiness of the monetary system. Modifications to those necessities, whether or not upward or downward, can have far-reaching penalties for financial institution lending, funding exercise, and general financial development. The core connection lies within the potential for a brand new administration to view current capital guidelines as both overly burdensome, hindering financial enlargement, or as insufficient, posing dangers to monetary stability. For instance, proponents of looser capital necessities may argue that they unencumber capital for elevated lending to small companies, thereby stimulating job creation. Conversely, these favoring stricter necessities may level to the 2008 monetary disaster as proof of the risks of undercapitalized banks, advocating for greater capital ratios to mitigate future systemic threat.
The affect of capital requirement shifts extends past the banking sector. Decreased necessities might result in elevated availability of credit score and doubtlessly decrease rates of interest, benefiting debtors and stimulating funding. Nonetheless, this additionally carries the danger of encouraging extreme lending and asset bubbles. Conversely, elevated capital necessities might constrain lending, doubtlessly slowing financial development, however bolstering the resilience of the monetary system. The Basel III accords, for example, characterize a worldwide effort to strengthen financial institution capital necessities following the 2008 disaster, demonstrating the worldwide dimension of those regulatory choices. The magnitude of any shift, and the precise belongings to which the necessities apply, shall be vital determinants of the general financial impact. The method taken to the “Leverage Ratio” (Capital divided by Whole Property) may have nice results and could also be some extent of competition.
In abstract, capital requirement shifts are a vital facet to think about when analyzing the potential implications of “trump new financial institution legal guidelines 2025.” The path and magnitude of those shifts will immediately affect the danger profile of the banking sector, the provision of credit score, and the broader financial panorama. Understanding the potential penalties of altered capital guidelines is important for monetary establishments, policymakers, and the general public alike to anticipate and adapt to the evolving regulatory atmosphere and potential adjustments.
3. Shopper safety revisions
Potential client safety revisions below the umbrella of “trump new financial institution legal guidelines 2025” characterize a vital space of focus, influencing the connection between monetary establishments and particular person customers. Any alterations to current rules might considerably affect entry to credit score, affordability of economic merchandise, and recourse mechanisms for customers going through unfair or misleading practices. The scope and nature of those revisions will form the monetary well-being of households throughout the financial spectrum.
-
Modifications to the Shopper Monetary Safety Bureau (CFPB)
The CFPB’s authority and scope may very well be topic to revision. This might entail alterations to its enforcement powers, its rulemaking authority, or its funding construction. For instance, a discount within the CFPB’s means to analyze and prosecute unfair, misleading, or abusive practices might result in a weakening of client safeguards in opposition to predatory lending and different monetary misconduct. Traditionally, debates surrounding the CFPB’s construction and mandate have mirrored broader disagreements in regards to the acceptable stage of presidency intervention within the monetary market.
-
Modifications to Lending Rules
Revisions to lending rules, equivalent to these governing mortgage lending, payday lending, or scholar mortgage servicing, might considerably have an effect on customers’ means to entry inexpensive credit score. As an illustration, a loosening of restrictions on high-interest lending might develop entry to credit score for some debtors but additionally improve the danger of debt traps and monetary hardship. The Fact in Lending Act (TILA) and the Actual Property Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) are examples of current rules that may very well be focused for modification, impacting disclosure necessities and client protections.
-
Alterations to Knowledge Privateness and Safety Guidelines
Modifications to information privateness and safety guidelines governing monetary establishments might affect customers’ management over their private monetary data. For instance, a weakening of information safety requirements might improve the danger of id theft and monetary fraud. The Honest Credit score Reporting Act (FCRA) and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act are examples of rules that safeguard client information and may very well be topic to revision, influencing how monetary establishments gather, use, and share client data.
-
Modifications to Arbitration Agreements
The flexibility of customers to pursue authorized motion in opposition to monetary establishments may very well be affected by revisions to guidelines governing arbitration agreements. Obligatory arbitration clauses, which require customers to resolve disputes by arbitration slightly than in courtroom, usually restrict customers’ means to hunt redress for grievances. Modifications to the enforceability of those clauses might have important implications for customers’ authorized rights and their means to carry monetary establishments accountable for misconduct.
These potential client safety revisions, as a part of “trump new financial institution legal guidelines 2025,” spotlight the advanced interaction between regulatory oversight, client entry to monetary companies, and the potential for each advantages and dangers. The precise type these revisions take will in the end decide their affect on the monetary well-being of customers and the general stability of the monetary system. Inspecting historic precedents and assessing the potential penalties of regulatory adjustments are essential for making certain a good and equitable monetary market.
4. Oversight company affect
Oversight company affect is a vital consider assessing the potential affect of “trump new financial institution legal guidelines 2025.” The interpretation and enforcement of any new laws by businesses such because the Federal Reserve, the FDIC, and the OCC will considerably form its sensible impact on the monetary trade and the broader economic system. The regulatory panorama is in the end outlined by the businesses charged with implementing and imposing the legal guidelines handed by Congress.
-
Rulemaking Authority
Oversight businesses possess the authority to promulgate guidelines and rules that make clear and develop upon the provisions of banking legal guidelines. This rulemaking energy permits them to translate broad legislative mandates into particular necessities for monetary establishments. For instance, if “trump new financial institution legal guidelines 2025” had been to switch capital necessities, the Federal Reserve can be accountable for growing detailed guidelines specifying how these necessities are calculated and utilized. The stringency or leniency of those guidelines can considerably have an effect on the burden of compliance on banks and the general stage of economic stability.
-
Supervisory Practices
Oversight businesses conduct common examinations and supervisory critiques of economic establishments to evaluate their compliance with banking legal guidelines and rules. The depth and scope of those supervisory actions can affect banks’ conduct and risk-taking. As an illustration, a extra proactive and intrusive supervisory method could deter banks from partaking in dangerous actions or pursuing regulatory loopholes. Conversely, a extra hands-off method might permit banks larger latitude to function with much less regulatory constraint. The Federal Reserves stress exams, carried out yearly on giant banks, exemplify the ability of supervisory practices to form financial institution conduct.
-
Enforcement Actions
Oversight businesses have the authority to take enforcement actions in opposition to monetary establishments that violate banking legal guidelines or rules. These actions can embrace fines, cease-and-desist orders, and different sanctions. The willingness and talent of oversight businesses to vigorously implement banking legal guidelines can function a strong deterrent in opposition to misconduct and promote compliance with regulatory requirements. Excessive-profile enforcement actions, equivalent to these taken in opposition to banks concerned in mortgage securitization abuses through the 2008 monetary disaster, reveal the potential affect of company enforcement on the trade.
-
Interpretive Steering
Oversight businesses steadily challenge interpretive steerage to supply clarification on the which means and utility of banking legal guidelines and rules. This steerage can assist banks perceive their regulatory obligations and adjust to the regulation. Nonetheless, interpretive steerage will also be a supply of uncertainty, as businesses could change their interpretations over time. The OCC’s interpretive letters on permissible actions for nationwide banks, for instance, can have a big affect on the varieties of monetary companies that banks are allowed to supply.
In conclusion, the affect of oversight businesses is an important consideration in evaluating the potential results of “trump new financial institution legal guidelines 2025.” The businesses’ rulemaking authority, supervisory practices, enforcement actions, and interpretive steerage will collectively decide the sensible affect of any new laws on the monetary system. Understanding the views and priorities of those businesses is important for anticipating the long run regulatory panorama and assessing the implications for monetary establishments and the broader economic system.
5. Lending follow adjustments
The potential for alterations in lending practices constitutes a big facet of “trump new financial institution legal guidelines 2025.” Modifications to legal guidelines and rules governing banking operations inevitably have an effect on how monetary establishments lengthen credit score to companies and people. These alterations can manifest as modifications to underwriting requirements, mortgage product choices, or the general availability of credit score. As an illustration, deregulation geared toward lowering the compliance burden on banks could result in a loosening of lending requirements, leading to a rise within the quantity of loans issued, doubtlessly to debtors who may not have certified below stricter rules. The converse can also be attainable; new rules meant to curtail perceived excesses in lending practices may result in extra stringent underwriting and a contraction in credit score availability.
The cause-and-effect relationship between new banking legal guidelines and lending practices is advanced. Contemplate, for instance, the affect of adjustments to the Dodd-Frank Act’s provisions. A rollback of sure rules might encourage banks to have interaction in riskier lending practices, doubtlessly resulting in asset bubbles and monetary instability. Alternatively, rules targeted on client safety might mandate larger transparency in mortgage phrases and prohibit predatory lending practices, thereby enhancing monetary outcomes for debtors. The sensible significance of understanding these potential adjustments lies in anticipating their results on numerous sectors of the economic system. If lending requirements are relaxed, sure industries, equivalent to actual property, might expertise a increase, whereas stricter requirements might constrain development in sectors reliant on entry to credit score.
In abstract, lending follow adjustments are an necessary factor inside the broader context of attainable “trump new financial institution legal guidelines 2025.” These adjustments have the potential to considerably have an effect on each the provision and value of credit score for companies and customers. Cautious monitoring of proposed legislative adjustments and their potential affect on lending practices is important for understanding the potential ramifications for financial development and monetary stability. Efficiently navigating these adjustments would require monetary establishments to adapt their methods to accommodate the evolving regulatory atmosphere, whereas debtors would want to know how these adjustments may have an effect on their entry to credit score and the phrases of their loans.
6. Monetary know-how regulation
Monetary know-how (FinTech) regulation represents a vital intersection with potential “trump new financial institution legal guidelines 2025,” because of the quickly evolving nature of economic companies and the necessity to adapt current authorized frameworks to accommodate new applied sciences. The mixing of know-how into banking and finance requires regulatory adaptation to deal with novel challenges and alternatives. Future regulatory approaches will form the event and deployment of FinTech improvements, impacting each established monetary establishments and rising FinTech companies.
-
Cryptocurrency and Digital Asset Oversight
The regulation of cryptocurrencies and different digital belongings, equivalent to stablecoins, presents a big problem for policymakers. Future banking legal guidelines may handle points equivalent to client safety, anti-money laundering (AML) compliance, and the systemic dangers posed by these belongings. As an illustration, a brand new regulation may set up a framework for licensing and supervising cryptocurrency exchanges, much like current rules for conventional monetary establishments. The European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Property (MiCA) regulation gives a mannequin for complete digital asset regulation.
-
Regulation of On-line Lending Platforms
On-line lending platforms have gained prominence in recent times, providing different sources of credit score to customers and small companies. These platforms usually function exterior the standard regulatory framework for banks, elevating issues about client safety, truthful lending practices, and information privateness. Future banking legal guidelines may lengthen regulatory oversight to those platforms, requiring them to adjust to the identical client safety requirements as conventional lenders. State-level rules in the USA, equivalent to these focusing on predatory lending practices by on-line lenders, provide examples of focused regulatory interventions.
-
Synthetic Intelligence (AI) and Machine Studying (ML) in Finance
The usage of AI and ML in monetary companies, together with credit score scoring, fraud detection, and algorithmic buying and selling, presents each alternatives and dangers. Regulators might want to develop frameworks for making certain that AI and ML techniques are clear, truthful, and accountable. Future banking legal guidelines may require monetary establishments to validate their AI fashions for bias and discrimination, and to supply clear explanations of how these fashions make choices. The Algorithmic Accountability Act, proposed within the U.S. Congress, illustrates the rising curiosity in regulating AI-driven decision-making.
-
Knowledge Safety and Cybersecurity Necessities
The growing reliance on know-how in monetary companies has heightened the significance of information safety and cybersecurity. Monetary establishments are weak to cyberattacks that may compromise delicate buyer information and disrupt monetary operations. Future banking legal guidelines may strengthen information safety and cybersecurity necessities for monetary establishments, requiring them to implement sturdy safety measures and to report information breaches promptly. The New York Division of Monetary Companies (NYDFS) Cybersecurity Regulation gives a mannequin for complete cybersecurity necessities for monetary establishments.
The sides of FinTech regulation outlined above are intently linked to the broader implications of “trump new financial institution legal guidelines 2025.” The method taken to regulating FinTech will form the aggressive panorama of the monetary trade, the provision of economic companies to customers and companies, and the general stability of the monetary system. Placing a steadiness between fostering innovation and defending customers and the monetary system shall be a key problem for policymakers as they grapple with the quickly evolving FinTech panorama.
7. Systemic threat administration
Systemic threat administration is a central concern when contemplating the potential impacts of “trump new financial institution legal guidelines 2025.” Rules affecting the monetary sector have direct implications for the steadiness of your complete system, doubtlessly mitigating or exacerbating the danger of widespread monetary misery. Efficient systemic threat administration goals to stop the failure of 1 monetary establishment from triggering a cascade of failures all through the system.
-
Designation of Systemically Necessary Monetary Establishments (SIFIs)
The method of figuring out and regulating SIFIs is a key facet of systemic threat administration. These establishments, on account of their measurement, interconnectedness, and complexity, pose a big menace to the steadiness of the monetary system in the event that they had been to fail. “trump new financial institution legal guidelines 2025” might alter the factors for designating SIFIs or modify the regulatory necessities imposed on them. For instance, elevating the asset threshold for SIFI designation might take away sure establishments from heightened regulatory scrutiny, doubtlessly growing systemic threat. Conversely, stricter rules on SIFIs might scale back the probability of their failure but additionally improve their compliance prices and doubtlessly constrain their lending actions. The failure of Lehman Brothers in 2008 underscores the potential penalties of insufficient SIFI regulation.
-
Stress Testing and Capital Adequacy
Stress testing and capital adequacy necessities are essential instruments for assessing the resilience of economic establishments to hostile financial circumstances. Stress exams simulate the affect of hypothetical situations, equivalent to a extreme recession or a pointy decline in asset values, on banks’ steadiness sheets. Capital adequacy necessities mandate that banks maintain a specific amount of capital relative to their belongings, offering a buffer in opposition to losses. “trump new financial institution legal guidelines 2025” might modify the stress testing course of or alter capital adequacy necessities. For instance, easing capital necessities might improve banks’ profitability but additionally scale back their means to face up to monetary shocks. The Basel III accords characterize a worldwide effort to strengthen capital adequacy necessities and improve the resilience of the monetary system.
-
Decision Authority and Orderly Liquidation
Decision authority gives regulators with the ability to take management of failing monetary establishments and handle their orderly liquidation, minimizing the disruption to the monetary system. “trump new financial institution legal guidelines 2025” might have an effect on the scope of decision authority or modify the procedures for orderly liquidation. As an illustration, limiting the federal government’s means to intervene within the occasion of a financial institution failure might improve systemic threat. The Dodd-Frank Act established a decision course of often called “orderly liquidation authority” to deal with the potential failure of SIFIs. This mechanism permits regulators to wind down a failing establishment with out resorting to taxpayer-funded bailouts.
-
Regulation of Derivatives and Interconnectedness
The regulation of derivatives and the interconnectedness of economic establishments is important for managing systemic threat. Derivatives, equivalent to credit score default swaps, can amplify monetary shocks and unfold them quickly all through the system. The interconnectedness of economic establishments, by lending relationships and different monetary linkages, may also facilitate the transmission of economic misery. “trump new financial institution legal guidelines 2025” might alter the regulation of derivatives or modify the principles governing interbank lending. For instance, requiring central clearing of standardized derivatives transactions reduces counterparty threat and enhances transparency. The near-collapse of AIG in 2008, on account of its publicity to credit score default swaps, highlights the potential systemic dangers related to derivatives.
The sides of systemic threat administration are interwoven with the potential impacts of “trump new financial institution legal guidelines 2025.” Any changes to the regulatory framework should rigorously take into account the potential results on the steadiness of your complete monetary system. A failure to adequately handle systemic threat might have devastating penalties for the economic system, as demonstrated by the 2008 monetary disaster. Due to this fact, a complete understanding of systemic threat and its administration is essential for evaluating the implications of potential adjustments to banking legal guidelines and rules.
Often Requested Questions Relating to Potential Banking Laws in 2025
The next questions and solutions handle key issues surrounding potential adjustments to banking legal guidelines which will emerge following the subsequent presidential administration.
Query 1: What is supposed by “trump new financial institution legal guidelines 2025”?
The time period encompasses potential alterations to the legislative and regulatory framework governing monetary establishments, hypothetically enacted throughout or after a presidential time period starting in 2025. This consists of revisions to current rules, equivalent to these stemming from the Dodd-Frank Act, or the implementation of completely new statutes addressing rising monetary applied sciences and market practices.
Query 2: What areas of banking regulation are most definitely to be affected?
A number of areas may very well be topic to revision, together with capital necessities for banks, client safety rules, oversight company authorities, lending practices, and the regulation of economic applied sciences equivalent to cryptocurrencies. The precise focus will rely upon the priorities of the incoming administration and the prevailing financial circumstances.
Query 3: How may deregulation have an effect on the monetary system?
Deregulation might result in elevated competitors and innovation inside the monetary sector, doubtlessly stimulating financial development. Nonetheless, it additionally carries the danger of elevated monetary instability and extreme risk-taking by monetary establishments, doubtlessly undermining the protection and soundness of the system.
Query 4: What are the potential penalties of adjustments to capital necessities?
Decreased capital necessities might improve the provision of credit score, doubtlessly benefiting debtors and stimulating funding. Nonetheless, decrease capital buffers additionally make banks extra weak to losses throughout financial downturns, growing the danger of failure and systemic instability.
Query 5: How might client safety rules be affected?
Shopper safety rules may very well be revised to strengthen or weaken safeguards in opposition to predatory lending, unfair practices, and information breaches. The extent and nature of those revisions will considerably affect customers’ entry to inexpensive monetary companies and their means to hunt redress for grievances.
Query 6: What position do oversight businesses play in implementing new banking legal guidelines?
Oversight businesses such because the Federal Reserve, the FDIC, and the OCC are accountable for deciphering and imposing banking legal guidelines. Their rulemaking authority, supervisory practices, and enforcement actions will considerably form the sensible impact of any new laws on the monetary trade and the broader economic system.
The solutions supplied provide a basis for comprehending the potential implications of future banking rules. The precise penalties, nevertheless, will rely upon the precise legislative selections made and the next actions of regulatory our bodies.
The following part explores the broader financial implications related to these regulatory adjustments.
Navigating Potential Banking Legislation Modifications in 2025
The next insights provide strategic issues for stakeholders doubtlessly affected by shifts within the regulatory panorama of the monetary sector.
Tip 1: Intently Monitor Legislative Developments: Monitor proposed payments, committee hearings, and ground votes associated to banking regulation. Publicly out there data from Congress, regulatory businesses, and respected monetary information sources gives helpful perception.
Tip 2: Analyze Potential Impacts on Enterprise Fashions: Monetary establishments ought to assess how proposed adjustments could have an effect on their current enterprise fashions, lending practices, and compliance obligations. Establish areas of potential vulnerability and develop contingency plans.
Tip 3: Interact with Regulatory Companies: Take part within the rulemaking course of by submitting feedback on proposed rules. Direct engagement with regulatory businesses gives a chance to form the ultimate guidelines and specific issues relating to potential unintended penalties.
Tip 4: Diversify Funding Sources: Banks ought to discover diversifying their funding sources to cut back reliance on conventional deposits and mitigate the affect of potential adjustments to deposit insurance coverage rules or rate of interest insurance policies. A balanced funding portfolio enhances monetary stability.
Tip 5: Strengthen Threat Administration Frameworks: Implement sturdy threat administration frameworks that may adapt to evolving regulatory necessities. Often assess and replace threat fashions, stress take a look at situations, and compliance procedures to make sure resilience within the face of regulatory uncertainty.
Tip 6: Improve Cybersecurity Posture: As monetary know-how rules evolve, prioritize cybersecurity measures to guard in opposition to information breaches and cyberattacks. Put money into superior safety applied sciences and implement sturdy cybersecurity protocols to safeguard buyer information and monetary belongings.
Tip 7: Consider Merger and Acquisition Alternatives: Consolidation inside the monetary sector could speed up in response to regulatory adjustments. Consider potential merger and acquisition alternatives to boost scale, effectivity, and aggressive positioning.
Tip 8: Seek the advice of with Authorized and Regulatory Specialists: Search professional recommendation from authorized and regulatory professionals to navigate the advanced regulatory panorama. Receive steerage on compliance necessities, threat administration methods, and potential authorized challenges to new rules.
These methods characterize proactive steps for navigating potential alterations. The final word affect hinges on particular particulars inside the laws and businesses implementing adjustments to the framework.
The following data shifts to a concluding synopsis of the core discussions examined on this article.
Conclusion
This exploration of “trump new financial institution legal guidelines 2025” has illuminated potential shifts within the regulatory panorama of the monetary sector. Key areas of focus have included deregulation potentialities, capital requirement shifts, client safety revisions, oversight company affect, lending follow adjustments, monetary know-how regulation, and systemic threat administration. Every of those areas presents each alternatives and dangers for monetary establishments, customers, and the broader economic system.
The long run path of banking regulation stays unsure. It’s essential for stakeholders to stay vigilant, knowledgeable, and proactive in navigating potential adjustments. Vigilant monitoring of legislative and regulatory developments, sturdy threat administration practices, and proactive engagement with policymakers shall be important for adapting to the evolving monetary panorama and safeguarding the steadiness and prosperity of the monetary system. The alternatives made within the coming years may have profound and lasting penalties for the monetary well being of the nation.
