Sure phrases reportedly confronted restrictions in utilization inside particular governmental contexts in the course of the Trump administration. These phrases, whereas not explicitly outlawed in a authorized sense, allegedly encountered discouragement or prohibition in official paperwork, experiences, and communications from explicit companies. Examples embrace phrases associated to local weather change and variety.
The reported limitations on language selections inside authorities circles elevate considerations about transparency, scientific integrity, and the potential for political affect over goal reporting. The follow generated dialogue concerning the position of presidency in shaping public discourse and the potential penalties of altering established terminologies, notably when describing advanced scientific or social points. The historic context includes a broader dialogue in regards to the relationship between politics, language, and the communication of factual data.