The phrase in query refers to reported cases through the Trump administration the place sure phrases had been allegedly discouraged or prohibited from use inside particular governmental companies and departments. This observe, ostensibly supposed to streamline communication or align messaging with coverage goals, successfully restricted the vocabulary employed by authorities workers of their official capacities. For instance, studies indicated limitations on the usage of phrases like “local weather change” inside environmental companies.
Such directives carry implications for transparency, scientific integrity, and public discourse. Limiting the vocabulary obtainable to authorities officers can obfuscate essential data, doubtlessly hindering efficient coverage growth and public understanding of vital points. Traditionally, governments have typically sought to manage language to form narratives and affect public opinion, elevating considerations about potential censorship and manipulation.