The time period “segregation ban,” when referring to actions taken throughout the Trump administration, mostly factors to the rescinding of truthful housing rules designed to fight discriminatory housing practices. These rules, carried out beneath the Obama administration, aimed to handle disparate influence, the place insurance policies that seem impartial on the floor can have discriminatory results on protected teams. For example, a landlord’s strict “no legal document” coverage might disproportionately have an effect on minority candidates who could have greater charges of arrest on account of historic and systemic biases within the legal justice system.
These truthful housing guidelines have been seen as vital instruments for guaranteeing equal entry to housing and stopping refined types of discrimination that always perpetuate segregation. Advocates argued that they offered a mechanism to problem insurance policies and practices that, whereas not explicitly discriminatory, had the impact of denying housing alternatives based mostly on race, ethnicity, or different protected traits. Traditionally, such rules have been essential in dismantling discriminatory practices that contribute to residential segregation and restrict entry to alternatives for marginalized communities.
