The phrase alludes to cases the place members of the press react with amusement to statements or actions made by a specific political determine. This response can manifest as audible laughter, delicate smiles, or different nonverbal cues conveying disbelief or ridicule. For instance, a press convention that includes surprising or controversial remarks may elicit such a response from journalists current.
The importance of such cases lies of their potential to form public notion. Laughter, notably when displayed by revered information sources, can undermine the perceived authority or credibility of the person being noticed. Traditionally, the connection between political leaders and the press has usually been adversarial, with moments of levity or derision punctuating durations of significant inquiry and debate. The visible and auditory document of those reactions may be amplified by way of media channels, influencing broader public opinion.
