The phrase in query implies a negation of significance to spoken statements made by Donald Trump. It means that these utterances shouldn’t be thought of authoritative or binding. For instance, actions taken based mostly solely on these pronouncements may be deemed invalid or inconsequential.
This attitude positive factors significance when evaluating the implications of casual communications versus official coverage declarations. It highlights the necessity to differentiate between off-the-cuff remarks and formally documented selections. Traditionally, the load given to presidential statements has diversified, resulting in debates relating to the binding nature of casual pronouncements.
