The phrase refers to cases the place the chief department, beneath the management of Donald Trump, acted to curtail or restrict the authority and scope of the judicial department. This might manifest in numerous varieties, equivalent to difficult judicial rulings, appointing judges with particular ideological leanings to reshape the judiciary, or in search of to limit the jurisdiction of courts in sure issues.
Such actions are vital as a result of they straight affect the stability of energy between the three branches of presidency. The independence of the judiciary is key to making sure the rule of legislation and defending particular person rights. Traditionally, checks and balances exist to forestall any single department from changing into too dominant. Altering this stability can elevate considerations in regards to the potential for abuse of energy and the erosion of constitutional rules. Moreover, limitations positioned on judicial evaluation could have an effect on the power of the courts to offer a test on government actions.
