The occasion being examined entails a former president elevating doubts concerning the established rights and belonging of people indigenous to the USA. This act, characterised by the expression of skepticism, challenges basic elements of nationwide identification and the authorized framework that defines citizenship. As an example, questioning the validity of tribal affiliations or historic treaties straight undermines the sovereign standing of Native American nations.
The importance lies in its potential to erode long-fought-for protections and perpetuate historic injustices. Such actions can gasoline discriminatory practices, incite social division, and impression entry to sources and self-determination for Native American communities. Moreover, it necessitates a crucial examination of historic treaties, authorized precedents, and the continued wrestle for indigenous rights and recognition inside the broader context of American society and authorities.
The next sections will delve into the authorized foundation of Native American citizenship, the historic context surrounding this subject, and the potential ramifications of difficult this established proper, offering a deeper understanding of the complexities concerned.
1. Sovereignty
The questioning of Native American citizenship straight impinges upon tribal sovereignty. Tribal sovereignty, inherent to Native American nations previous to the institution of the USA, grants tribes the appropriate to self-governance, together with figuring out their very own membership. Challenges to citizenship undermine this inherent proper by implying that an exterior entity, such because the U.S. authorities or its representatives, possesses the authority to dictate who belongs to a tribe. This straight contradicts the basic precept of tribal sovereignty, which asserts that tribes have the unique energy to find out their very own inner affairs.
An actual-life instance of this wrestle might be seen in historic and ongoing disputes over tribal enrollment standards. When exterior entities problem tribal enrollment selections, typically based mostly on blood quantum or different standards deemed inappropriate by the tribes themselves, it represents a direct assault on tribal self-determination. Furthermore, the potential impression extends past enrollment, influencing useful resource allocation, treaty rights, and the very existence of tribal nations as distinct political entities. The implications have an effect on the power of tribes to handle their lands, administer justice, and protect their cultural heritage.
Understanding this connection reveals that makes an attempt to query Native American citizenship will not be merely remoted incidents however fairly a part of a broader historic sample of undermining tribal sovereignty. The challenges persist, and require vigilance to safeguard and reaffirm the inherent rights of Native American nations. The power of Native American tribes to self-govern stays important for his or her survival and cultural integrity.
2. Treaty Rights
The act of questioning Native American citizenship straight impacts treaty rights, as these rights are sometimes predicated on the popularity of tribal members as residents of their respective nations and beneficiaries of agreements established between these nations and the USA. Treaties between the U.S. authorities and Native American tribes, ratified because the supreme legislation of the land underneath the Structure, assure particular rights to tribes and their members, together with land possession, looking and fishing privileges, and self-governance. When the citizenship standing of Native People is introduced into query, the muse upon which these treaty rights relaxation is destabilized.
For instance, treaty rights pertaining to entry to ancestral lands for cultural or financial functions are jeopardized when tribal members’ citizenship is disputed. People whose citizenship is challenged might face restricted entry to those lands, undermining their skill to follow conventional customs, maintain their livelihoods, and preserve their cultural heritage. Moreover, the federal authorities’s obligation to supply important providers, equivalent to healthcare and training, to tribal members as stipulated in treaties can be known as into query. This could result in a discount in funding and sources obtainable to Native American communities, exacerbating current disparities and undermining their self-sufficiency. Think about the historic precedent of the Dawes Act, which sought to allot tribal lands to particular person Native People, thereby undermining tribal sovereignty and opening up huge tracts of land for non-Native settlement. Such actions, though ostensibly aimed toward assimilation, had the impact of stripping Native People of their land base and eroding their treaty rights. The repercussions of those previous insurance policies proceed to impression Native American communities at the moment.
Finally, difficult the citizenship of Native People represents a direct assault on the authorized and ethical basis of treaty rights. These treaties will not be merely historic paperwork however residing agreements that outline the connection between the USA and Native American tribes. Defending and upholding these treaty rights requires an unwavering dedication to recognizing the inherent sovereignty of Native American nations and the citizenship of their members. The constant questioning of Native American citizenship represents a big risk to the steadiness and well-being of Native American communities and undermines the rules of justice and fairness.
3. Authorized Challenges
Authorized challenges arising from questioning Native American citizenship characterize a fancy interaction of constitutional legislation, treaty obligations, and federal Indian legislation. Such challenges not solely impression particular person rights but in addition threaten the sovereignty and self-determination of tribal nations. The act of disputing established citizenship statuses can set off authorized proceedings that traverse a number of ranges of the judicial system, probably setting precedents with far-reaching penalties.
-
Standing and Jurisdiction
A major authorized hurdle entails establishing standing, i.e., figuring out who has the appropriate to deliver a lawsuit difficult Native American citizenship. Federal courts sometimes require a demonstrable harm actually for a celebration to have standing. Furthermore, jurisdiction, the authority of a court docket to listen to a case, might be complicated, notably when tribal sovereignty intersects with federal or state legislation. The Supreme Court docket’s ruling in McGirt v. Oklahoma (2020) affirmed the continued existence of the Muscogee (Creek) Nations reservation, highlighting the significance of jurisdictional issues in circumstances affecting Native American rights.
-
Equal Safety Clause
Challenges to Native American citizenship typically elevate questions underneath the Equal Safety Clause of the Fourteenth Modification, which prohibits states from denying any particular person inside their jurisdiction the equal safety of the legal guidelines. If citizenship challenges are based mostly on discriminatory standards, equivalent to race or ancestry, they could be deemed unconstitutional. For instance, if federal legal guidelines or insurance policies deal with Native People in a different way based mostly on their tribal affiliation, these legal guidelines could also be topic to strict scrutiny by the courts.
-
Treaty Interpretation
Many Native American citizenship rights are rooted in treaties between tribes and the U.S. authorities. Authorized challenges continuously contain deciphering the language and intent of those treaties. Courts typically apply the canon of building, a algorithm that dictate treaties needs to be interpreted as Native People would have understood them on the time they have been signed. Ambiguities are sometimes resolved in favor of the tribes. Disputes over treaty interpretation can result in protracted litigation, as seen in circumstances involving fishing rights within the Pacific Northwest.
-
Federal Recognition
The federal authorities’s recognition of a tribe performs a vital position in figuring out the citizenship standing of its members. The method for federal recognition is complicated and infrequently prolonged, involving intensive documentation and evaluate by the Bureau of Indian Affairs. If a tribe’s recognition is challenged, the citizenship of its members may additionally be known as into query. The popularity of the Mashpee Wampanoag tribe, for instance, has been topic to authorized challenges which have had a direct impression on the tribe’s skill to train its sovereign rights and the citizenship of its members.
These authorized aspects display the intricacies concerned when Native American citizenship is disputed. The complexities surrounding standing and jurisdiction, equal safety, treaty interpretation, and federal recognition spotlight the potential for protracted and consequential authorized battles. Every side underscores the crucial significance of upholding treaty obligations, respecting tribal sovereignty, and guaranteeing that Native Americans are afforded the identical rights and protections as all different residents underneath the legislation. The underlying subject of questioning citizenship serves as a catalyst for these authorized challenges, bringing into sharp focus the continued wrestle for recognition and self-determination inside Native American communities.
4. Historic Injustice
The questioning of Native American citizenship is inextricably linked to an extended historical past of injustice perpetrated towards indigenous populations. The historic context reveals a sample of systematic makes an attempt to dispossess Native People of their land, tradition, and rights, courting again to the earliest days of European colonization. This historical past consists of compelled removals, damaged treaties, cultural assimilation insurance policies, and the denial of fundamental civil rights. Towards this backdrop, questioning citizenship represents a continuation of those injustices, echoing previous efforts to marginalize and disenfranchise Native American communities.
Think about the Dawes Act of 1887, which aimed to interrupt up tribal lands into particular person allotments, successfully eroding tribal sovereignty and opening up huge tracts of land for non-Native settlement. Or the compelled assimilation insurance policies of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, which sought to eradicate Native American languages and cultures via boarding colleges. These historic actions have had lasting penalties, contributing to intergenerational trauma, financial disparities, and the erosion of tribal identification. Due to this fact, modern questioning of Native American citizenship can’t be considered in isolation however should be understood as a symptom of a broader historic sample of oppression. The act not solely undermines authorized and treaty rights but in addition perpetuates a story that delegitimizes Native American existence and self-determination.
Understanding this historic connection is essential for addressing the underlying problems with injustice that proceed to plague Native American communities. Acknowledging the historic context permits for a extra knowledgeable and nuanced method to modern challenges, together with problems with citizenship, sovereignty, and self-determination. By recognizing the historic injustices, it turns into potential to dismantle the systemic boundaries that perpetuate inequality and create a extra simply and equitable society for all. Ignoring the previous dangers repeating its errors, whereas acknowledging and addressing it might pave the way in which for reconciliation and therapeutic. It is usually a essential step in direction of honoring the treaty obligations and upholding the inherent rights of Native American nations.
5. Political Discourse
Political discourse surrounding situations of questioning Native American citizenship typically serves as each a mirrored image and a catalyst for broader societal attitudes towards indigenous rights and sovereignty. When distinguished political figures publicly elevate doubts in regards to the legitimacy of Native American citizenship, it lends credence to discriminatory narratives and may embolden others to problem the established authorized and social standing of Native American communities. This discourse can manifest in varied types, starting from direct questioning of treaty rights to the promotion of insurance policies that undermine tribal self-governance. The impression will not be restricted to coverage; it permeates public opinion, shaping perceptions of Native American identification and belonging.
The impact of political discourse on Native American citizenship is multifaceted. Firstly, it might incite authorized challenges and administrative actions that straight threaten tribal sovereignty and treaty rights. Secondly, it might foster a local weather of hostility and discrimination, resulting in elevated prejudice and marginalization of Native American people and communities. Examples embrace debates over land rights, useful resource allocation, and the supply of federal providers to tribal members, all of which are sometimes framed in ways in which query the legitimacy of Native American claims. Think about the debates surrounding the Dakota Entry Pipeline, the place political rhetoric typically downplayed the considerations of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe concerning environmental and cultural impacts. The sensible significance of understanding this connection lies within the skill to critically analyze political messaging and establish rhetoric that seeks to undermine Native American rights and sovereignty. This evaluation informs advocacy efforts, enabling stakeholders to counter misinformation and promote insurance policies that uphold treaty obligations and shield indigenous communities.
In conclusion, political discourse performs a crucial position in shaping the context inside which Native American citizenship is debated and contested. It’s important to acknowledge the facility of political rhetoric to affect public opinion, impression coverage selections, and finally have an effect on the well-being of Native American communities. By understanding the nuances of this discourse, it turns into potential to advocate for insurance policies and practices that promote justice, fairness, and respect for tribal sovereignty. The challenges are ongoing, however the crucial to problem discriminatory narratives and uphold treaty obligations stays paramount. Acknowledging and addressing the historic and modern impacts of political discourse on Native American citizenship is important for fostering a extra simply and equitable society.
6. Tribal Id
Tribal identification, a fancy interaction of ancestry, tradition, group, and self-identification, is intrinsically linked to the political and authorized challenges posed by questioning Native American citizenship. These challenges straight have an effect on the core parts of tribal identification, probably undermining the very material of Native American communities.
-
Blood Quantum and Descent
Many tribes make the most of blood quantum, a measurement of Native American ancestry, or lineal descent as standards for membership. Questioning citizenship based mostly on these standards, typically with exterior interference, disrupts tribal sovereignty in figuring out membership. As an example, the imposition of particular blood quantum necessities by the federal authorities previously has led to the exclusion of people with authentic ties to their communities. This exterior strain can fracture tribal unity and create inner divisions, undermining the collective identification.
-
Cultural Practices and Language
Tribal identification is deeply rooted in cultural practices, traditions, and language. When citizenship is questioned, people might face restricted entry to cultural websites, ceremonies, and language revitalization packages, thereby hindering their skill to completely take part in and protect their cultural heritage. The long-term penalties embrace the erosion of cultural data and the weakening of intergenerational ties, threatening the continuity of tribal identification.
-
Neighborhood Recognition and Belonging
Neighborhood recognition is a crucial facet of tribal identification, affirming a person’s connection to and acceptance inside their tribal group. Questioning citizenship can result in social stigma and exclusion, disrupting a person’s sense of belonging and diminishing their social capital inside the group. This could manifest as discrimination in entry to housing, employment, and different sources, additional marginalizing these whose citizenship is underneath scrutiny.
-
Sovereign Standing and Self-Dedication
Tribal identification is intertwined with the sovereign standing and self-determination of Native American nations. When citizenship is questioned, it undermines the tribe’s inherent proper to outline its personal membership and govern its inner affairs. This exterior interference can weaken the tribe’s political and authorized standing, impacting its skill to guard its lands, sources, and cultural heritage. The act of difficult citizenship is finally an assault on the very basis of tribal self-governance.
The questioning of Native American citizenship, due to this fact, represents a direct risk to the core parts of tribal identification. The ramifications prolong past particular person rights, impacting the collective well-being, cultural continuity, and sovereign standing of Native American nations. These challenges necessitate a steadfast dedication to upholding tribal sovereignty and defending the rights of Native Americans to keep up their cultural heritage and self-determination.
7. Federal Recognition
Federal recognition, a proper acknowledgment by the USA federal authorities {that a} Native American tribe exists as a sovereign entity, considerably intersects with situations of questioning Native American citizenship. This recognition confers sure rights, privileges, and tasks upon the tribe, together with the power to enter into government-to-government relationships, entry federal packages, and shield cultural sources. Scrutiny of citizenship, notably when initiated or amplified by political figures, can straight problem the idea of federal recognition and its related advantages.
-
Legitimacy of Tribal Membership
Federal recognition hinges on demonstrating the historic continuity and distinctiveness of a tribal group. Questioning the citizenship of tribal members undermines this demonstration, probably weakening the tribe’s declare to recognition. For instance, if the federal authorities have been to problem the membership standards of a acknowledged tribe based mostly on politically motivated claims, it might set off a reevaluation of the tribe’s acknowledged standing, resulting in a revocation or suspension of federal advantages.
-
Entry to Federal Applications and Funding
Federally acknowledged tribes are eligible for a variety of federal packages and funding aimed toward supporting tribal governance, healthcare, training, and financial growth. Questioning citizenship can create uncertainty about who’s eligible to obtain these providers, probably resulting in delays, reductions, or denials of help. In situations the place a big portion of a tribe’s membership faces citizenship challenges, the whole tribal group might expertise important disruptions in entry to important providers.
-
Treaty Rights and Land Claims
Federal recognition is commonly essential for a tribe to claim its treaty rights and pursue land claims. Challenges to citizenship can weaken a tribe’s skill to implement these rights, because the legitimacy of its members’ connection to the treaty or land known as into query. In circumstances the place treaties outline citizenship standards, questioning these standards can create authorized ambiguities that hinder the tribe’s skill to guard its ancestral lands and sources.
-
Sovereign Immunity and Self-Governance
Federal recognition grants tribes sovereign immunity, defending them from sure lawsuits, and affirms their proper to self-governance. Questioning citizenship undermines the tribe’s authority to find out its personal membership and govern its inner affairs, thereby eroding its sovereign standing. Exterior challenges to citizenship can create inner divisions inside the tribe, weakening its skill to successfully train its self-governance rights.
These aspects illustrate the crucial hyperlink between federal recognition and the questioning of Native American citizenship. Politically motivated challenges to citizenship can destabilize federally acknowledged tribes, undermining their authorized standing, entry to sources, and talent to guard their cultural heritage. This intersection emphasizes the significance of upholding tribal sovereignty and safeguarding the rights of Native Americans towards unwarranted scrutiny.
8. Racial Bias
Racial bias, whether or not acutely aware or unconscious, types a crucial backdrop to understanding the occasion of questioning Native American citizenship. It serves as a lens via which historic injustices, discriminatory insurance policies, and chronic societal inequalities are illuminated. This bias, embedded inside systemic constructions, informs perceptions and actions, influencing not solely particular person attitudes but in addition the formulation and enforcement of legal guidelines and insurance policies that impression Native American communities.
-
Historic Stereotypes and Dehumanization
Historic stereotypes portraying Native People as uncivilized, savage, or much less deserving of rights have contributed to a long-standing sample of dehumanization. This bias manifests within the questioning of their identification, legitimacy, and connection to their land. Such stereotypes, perpetuated via media, training, and political rhetoric, create a local weather the place difficult Native American citizenship appears acceptable and even justified. For instance, the historic narrative of Manifest Future, which framed westward enlargement as a divinely ordained proper of white settlers, straight undermined Native American sovereignty and land rights. This legacy continues to affect modern perceptions and insurance policies.
-
Implicit Bias in Coverage and Authorized Techniques
Implicit biases, unconscious attitudes and stereotypes that have an effect on our understanding, actions, and selections, can permeate coverage and authorized programs. These biases might result in the discriminatory software of legal guidelines and rules, even within the absence of overt discriminatory intent. As an example, the stringent documentation necessities imposed on Native People to show their citizenship, whereas seemingly impartial, can disproportionately burden people from marginalized communities with restricted entry to sources. This delicate however pervasive type of bias can perpetuate systemic inequalities and undermine Native American rights.
-
Disparities in Entry to Sources and Alternatives
Racial bias contributes to disparities in entry to sources and alternatives for Native American communities, together with training, healthcare, housing, and financial growth. Questioning citizenship can exacerbate these disparities by creating uncertainty about eligibility for federal packages and providers. For instance, if a tribe’s membership rolls are challenged, it might result in disruptions in funding for important providers equivalent to healthcare and training, additional marginalizing an already susceptible inhabitants. These disparities, rooted in historic and ongoing biases, perpetuate a cycle of poverty and drawback.
-
Political Manipulation and Canine Whistle Politics
Racial bias might be exploited for political achieve via using coded language and canine whistle politics, interesting to prejudice and resentment with out explicitly stating discriminatory intentions. Questioning Native American citizenship can function a canine whistle, signaling to sure segments of the inhabitants that the rights and entitlements of Native People are illegitimate or undeserved. This manipulation of racial bias can mobilize political help and justify insurance policies that undermine tribal sovereignty and self-determination. Examples embrace rhetoric that frames Native American treaty rights as “particular rights” or unfair benefits, fueling resentment and division.
The occasion of questioning Native American citizenship is thus not an remoted occasion however a manifestation of deeply ingrained racial biases inside American society. These biases, rooted in historic stereotypes, perpetuated via implicit biases in coverage and authorized programs, amplified by disparities in entry to sources, and exploited for political manipulation, create a local weather the place the rights and identities of Native People are perpetually underneath risk. Addressing this subject requires a concerted effort to dismantle these systemic biases and promote a extra simply and equitable society for all.
Regularly Requested Questions Concerning Challenges to Native American Citizenship
This part addresses frequent queries associated to situations of questioning the citizenship of Native People, offering concise and informative solutions grounded in legislation and historic context.
Query 1: What’s the authorized foundation for Native American citizenship?
The authorized foundation for Native American citizenship stems from a mix of things, together with the 14th Modification to the U.S. Structure, treaties between the U.S. authorities and Native American tribes, and particular acts of Congress, such because the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924. This act granted full U.S. citizenship to all Native People born inside the territorial limits of the USA, no matter tribal affiliation.
Query 2: How does tribal sovereignty issue into citizenship determinations?
Tribal sovereignty grants Native American tribes the inherent proper to find out their very own membership standards. These standards might embrace blood quantum, lineal descent, or cultural affiliation. Whereas the U.S. authorities acknowledges Native People as U.S. residents, tribal nations retain the authority to determine their very own citizenship necessities, which can differ from federal necessities.
Query 3: What are the potential penalties of questioning Native American citizenship?
Questioning Native American citizenship can have far-reaching penalties, together with undermining tribal sovereignty, jeopardizing treaty rights, disrupting entry to federal packages and sources, and fostering discrimination towards Native American people and communities. Such actions may also result in authorized challenges and protracted litigation, creating uncertainty and instability inside tribal nations.
Query 4: How do historic treaties impression present citizenship debates?
Historic treaties between the U.S. authorities and Native American tribes typically outline the rights and obligations of each events, together with provisions associated to citizenship and land possession. These treaties are thought of the supreme legislation of the land and proceed to be related in modern citizenship debates. Decoding and upholding treaty obligations is important for safeguarding the rights and self-determination of Native American nations.
Query 5: What position does racial bias play in challenges to Native American citizenship?
Racial bias, whether or not acutely aware or unconscious, can contribute to the questioning of Native American citizenship. Stereotypes and historic prejudices might affect perceptions of Native American identification and legitimacy, resulting in discriminatory insurance policies and practices. Addressing racial bias is important for guaranteeing that Native People are afforded the identical rights and protections as all different residents.
Query 6: What recourses can be found to Native People whose citizenship is challenged?
Native People whose citizenship is challenged might have a number of recourses, together with searching for authorized illustration, interesting administrative selections, and advocating for legislative motion to guard their rights. Tribal governments and Native American advocacy organizations may also present help and help in navigating these challenges. Defending Native American citizenship requires a multifaceted method that features authorized advocacy, political mobilization, and public training.
In abstract, understanding the authorized and historic context surrounding Native American citizenship is essential for addressing challenges and defending the rights of indigenous communities. Respect for tribal sovereignty, adherence to treaty obligations, and the dismantling of racial biases are important for fostering a simply and equitable society.
The next part explores the position of advocacy and activism in safeguarding Native American citizenship rights.
Navigating the Implications of Difficult Native American Citizenship
The next ideas supply steering for understanding and responding to situations the place Native American citizenship is questioned. These suggestions emphasize consciousness, knowledgeable motion, and the significance of upholding authorized and moral requirements.
Tip 1: Perceive the Historic Context:
Examine the historic relationship between the U.S. authorities and Native American tribes. Familiarize your self with treaties, federal insurance policies, and historic injustices which have formed the present authorized and political panorama. This context is essential for deciphering modern challenges to citizenship.
Tip 2: Know the Authorized Framework:
Develop into accustomed to the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924, the 14th Modification, and related Supreme Court docket circumstances. Understanding the authorized foundation for Native American citizenship is important for countering misinformation and advocating for authorized protections. Analysis landmark circumstances which have affirmed tribal sovereignty and citizenship rights.
Tip 3: Help Tribal Sovereignty:
Acknowledge and respect the inherent proper of Native American tribes to find out their very own membership standards. Chorus from actions or statements that undermine tribal self-governance. Advocate for insurance policies that uphold tribal sovereignty and shield tribal lands and sources.
Tip 4: Fight Misinformation:
Actively counter false or deceptive details about Native American citizenship and tribal identification. Share correct info from dependable sources, equivalent to tribal governments, educational establishments, and respected information organizations. Interact in constructive dialogue to dispel stereotypes and promote understanding.
Tip 5: Promote Inclusive Language:
Use respectful and inclusive language when discussing Native American communities. Keep away from phrases that perpetuate stereotypes or dehumanize indigenous peoples. Acknowledge the range of tribal cultures and identities. Uphold respect when speaking with the Tribes.
Tip 6: Advocate for Coverage Modifications:
Help coverage modifications that strengthen Native American rights and promote fairness. Advocate for the enforcement of treaty obligations, the safety of tribal lands, and the supply of important providers to Native American communities. Contact elected officers to precise considerations and urge motion.
Tip 7: Interact in Dialogue and Schooling:
Take part in group occasions, workshops, and academic packages that promote understanding and respect for Native American cultures and histories. Interact in respectful dialogue with Native American leaders and group members to find out about their experiences and views. This can foster an surroundings for respect and higher understading.
The following pointers underscore the significance of knowledgeable consciousness and proactive engagement in addressing challenges to Native American citizenship. By understanding the historic context, authorized framework, and the importance of tribal sovereignty, people can successfully advocate for the rights and well-being of Native American communities.
These suggestions lay the groundwork for transitioning to a dialogue on the long-term methods essential to safeguard Native American citizenship rights.
Concluding Observations
The previous evaluation has explored the multifaceted implications of situations the place the citizenship of Native People is questioned, particularly referencing a situation characterised by the involvement of a former president. The investigation has illuminated the potential impacts on tribal sovereignty, treaty rights, authorized challenges, historic injustices, political discourse, tribal identification, federal recognition, and the pervasive affect of racial bias. These parts, when intertwined, current a fancy panorama the place basic rights and long-established authorized precedents are positioned in danger. The act of elevating doubts about citizenship, due to this fact, extends past a singular occasion, functioning as a catalyst for broader societal and political tensions.
Given the historic context of dispossession and marginalization endured by Native American communities, any problem to their citizenship warrants rigorous scrutiny and knowledgeable response. It necessitates a continued dedication to upholding treaty obligations, respecting tribal sovereignty, and dismantling systemic biases that perpetuate inequity. Future stability and justice demand a constant adherence to those rules, guaranteeing that the rights and identities of Native Americans are unequivocally protected. A failure to take action dangers repeating previous injustices and additional undermining the self-determination of indigenous nations.
