The convergence of a celebrated actor, a prestigious awards ceremony, and a former president usually generates vital public discourse. This intersection usually includes commentary, whether or not celebratory or essential, on political viewpoints expressed inside the leisure trade.
Such situations spotlight the enduring energy of movie star platforms to affect public opinion and form broader socio-political conversations. Traditionally, award exhibits have served as levels for people to voice their views, contributing to a bigger dialogue and probably sparking debate on related points. This could affect the notion of each the people concerned and the topics they tackle.
The next sections will delve into particular examples, the reactions they elicited, and the broader implications of such interactions inside the leisure panorama and the political sphere.
1. Actor’s political opinions
An actor’s publicly said political opinions usually intersect with their skilled profession, particularly when expressed on distinguished platforms such because the Oscars. These views turn into integral to the general public notion of the actor and, consequently, affect the reception of their work. Within the context of “robert de niro oscars trump,” De Niro’s established political leanings present a essential lens by means of which his statements on the awards ceremony are interpreted.
-
Alignment with Societal Ideologies
Actors steadily align themselves with particular political ideologies, shaping their public persona. De Niro’s critiques of Trump usually resonated with pre-existing liberal viewpoints, thereby amplifying his message inside these communities. Conversely, his statements drew criticism from conservative circles, highlighting the polarizing impact of movie star political activism. This alignment impacts each the actor’s fanbase and the general narrative surrounding their actions.
-
Affect on Profession Trajectory
Public expression of political opinions can have tangible results on an actor’s profession. Whereas some audiences could also be drawn to actors who share their beliefs, others could boycott their work as a consequence of ideological variations. De Niro’s outspoken criticism possible affected each his help base and the tasks he undertakes, shaping his future alternatives {and professional} relationships. Such results underscore the inherent dangers related to actors participating in political commentary.
-
Authenticity and Public Notion
The perceived authenticity of an actor’s political stance considerably influences its reception. If viewers imagine the actor genuinely holds the expressed views, their message is extra more likely to resonate. Nonetheless, if the stance is perceived as insincere or opportunistic, it might result in public backlash. De Niro’s long-standing political activism arguably lent credibility to his statements, although scrutiny stays a relentless consider shaping public notion.
-
Affect on Social Discourse
Actors possess the potential to form social discourse by means of their political pronouncements. Their statements can provoke public opinion, encourage political participation, and affect coverage debates. De Niro’s criticisms, voiced throughout a high-profile occasion, contributed to the continuing dialogue surrounding the Trump presidency, amplifying sure views and prompting counter-arguments. This highlights the highly effective function celebrities play within the modern political panorama.
The interaction between an actor’s political opinions and their public platform considerably shapes the context and affect of occasions akin to De Niro’s remarks. It underscores the significance of understanding these dynamics when analyzing the connection between movie star activism and political discourse. Additional analysis ought to examine the long-term results of those interactions and their affect on each particular person careers and broader societal attitudes.
2. Awards Ceremony Platform
The awards ceremony gives a singular and potent platform for the dissemination of messages, each inventive and political. The inherent visibility and world attain of occasions just like the Oscars imbue them with the facility to amplify statements, reworking them from private opinions into extensively mentioned public pronouncements. Within the occasion of “robert de niro oscars trump,” the awards ceremony served because the catalyst, offering the stage for the actor’s remarks to achieve an enormous viewers.
The platform’s significance stems from its established status and the implicit endorsement it lends to these granted entry. Consequently, when a person leverages this platform to specific a selected viewpoint, that viewpoint beneficial properties a level of credibility and salience it won’t in any other case possess. For instance, an actor criticizing a politician throughout a televised interview carries much less weight than the identical actor doing so on the Academy Awards. The previous is a standard incidence; the latter is a deliberate act of leveraging a privileged platform. Contemplate Marlon Brando’s 1973 Oscars protest; his absence and Sacheen Littlefeather’s speech highlighted Native American points, demonstrating the platform’s capability to broadcast marginalized voices.
The usage of an awards ceremony platform for political commentary carries inherent dangers and duties. Whereas it might successfully elevate consciousness and stimulate debate, it additionally invitations scrutiny and potential backlash. Subsequently, an understanding of the interaction between the person, the message, and the platform is essential to comprehending the occasion’s subsequent affect and its place inside the bigger context of movie star activism and political discourse. The platform itself doesn’t create the message, nevertheless it undoubtedly amplifies it, shaping its reception and influencing its enduring legacy.
3. Public determine criticism
Public determine criticism, particularly concentrating on distinguished people, kinds a cornerstone of political discourse. Within the context of “robert de niro oscars trump,” this criticism turns into amplified as a result of movie star standing of each the critic and the goal, leading to heightened media consideration and polarized public response.
-
Legitimacy and Authority
The perceived legitimacy of public determine criticism usually hinges on the speaker’s experience, expertise, or ethical standing. Robert De Niro’s standing as a revered actor grants him a sure stage of cultural authority, though this doesn’t essentially translate to political experience. Consequently, his criticisms of Trump are evaluated not solely on their content material but in addition on the idea of his public persona and perceived motives. This dynamic underscores the complicated interaction between movie star standing and political commentary.
-
Types of Criticism
Public determine criticism can manifest in varied kinds, starting from reasoned arguments to non-public assaults. De Niro’s feedback generally employed robust language and direct accusations, eliciting each robust help and condemnation. The selection of language considerably impacts the reception of the criticism, with measured and fact-based arguments usually thought-about extra persuasive than overtly private assaults. This highlights the significance of rhetoric in shaping public opinion.
-
Affect on Public Opinion
Criticism from public figures can considerably affect public opinion, significantly when delivered on distinguished platforms. De Niro’s remarks, made throughout a extensively seen awards present, possible reached a broad viewers and contributed to ongoing debates surrounding the Trump presidency. Nonetheless, the extent of this affect is troublesome to quantify, as public opinion is formed by quite a few elements, together with media protection, private experiences, and pre-existing beliefs. Nonetheless, movie star endorsements and criticisms stay potent instruments for shaping the narrative.
-
Backlash and Penalties
Public determine criticism usually invitations backlash, significantly when the goal is a robust or controversial determine. De Niro’s outspoken stance possible subjected him to criticism from Trump supporters and probably impacted his skilled alternatives. This underscores the dangers related to public activism, as celebrities who interact in political commentary could face unfavourable penalties, together with boycotts, social media assaults, and diminished profession prospects.
In abstract, the intersection of public determine criticism, movie star standing, and political commentary, as exemplified by “robert de niro oscars trump,” highlights the complexities of up to date political discourse. The perceived legitimacy of the criticism, its kind, its affect on public opinion, and the potential for backlash all contribute to the occasion’s significance and enduring legacy.
4. Media protection evaluation
Media protection evaluation, when utilized to the “robert de niro oscars trump” occasion, reveals the multifaceted methods wherein the actor’s remarks had been framed and disseminated throughout varied information shops and social media platforms. This evaluation necessitates analyzing the tone, frequency, and chosen quotes utilized in reporting, in addition to the framing of De Niro’s statements inside broader political narratives. A examine of headlines, picture choice, and the prominence given to completely different views illustrates how media shops probably formed public notion of the incident and its underlying political messages. For example, some shops may need emphasised the actor’s proper to free speech, whereas others centered on the perceived inappropriateness of utilizing an awards ceremony for political pronouncements. Such editorial selections spotlight the inherent subjectivity of media protection and its capability to affect public understanding.
The sensible significance of understanding media protection evaluation on this context lies in its means to deconstruct the narratives offered to the general public. By figuring out biases, framing strategies, and selective reporting, one can acquire a extra nuanced understanding of the occasion itself and the political local weather wherein it occurred. For instance, a content material evaluation of reports articles printed instantly following De Niro’s remarks may reveal a surge in articles specializing in the controversy itself, probably overshadowing the inventive achievements celebrated on the Oscars. Moreover, a comparative evaluation of protection throughout completely different media outletsconservative versus liberal, home versus internationalcould illuminate the vary of interpretations and political agendas influencing the reporting.
In conclusion, media protection evaluation serves as a vital device for discerning the complexities surrounding “robert de niro oscars trump”. It reveals how the media not solely reported on the occasion but in addition actively participated in shaping its which means and affect. The challenges inherent on this evaluation embrace accounting for the sheer quantity of data and acknowledging the potential for unintentional biases on the a part of the analyst. In the end, a radical media protection evaluation gives a beneficial lens by means of which to know the interaction between movie star activism, political discourse, and the media’s function in shaping public notion.
5. Societal affect discourse
Societal affect discourse, significantly concerning the intersection of movie star activism and political expression, beneficial properties vital traction when occasions akin to “robert de niro oscars trump” happen. These moments act as catalysts, prompting widespread debate in regards to the function of public figures in political discourse and the boundaries of acceptable expression.
-
Polarization of Public Opinion
De Niro’s statements, delivered on a extremely seen platform, exemplify the potential to additional polarize public opinion. His criticisms of Trump resonated strongly with sure segments of the inhabitants, whereas concurrently alienating others. This division usually extends past the particular situation at hand, reinforcing current ideological divides and contributing to a extra fragmented public sphere. The ripple results of such polarization can affect political discourse, social interactions, and even financial habits.
-
Re-evaluation of Celeb Affect
Incidents like this immediate a re-evaluation of the affect celebrities wield in shaping public opinion and political attitudes. Whereas some view movie star activism as a reputable type of civic engagement, others criticize it as an abuse of privilege or an try and impose private beliefs on others. The discourse surrounding “robert de niro oscars trump” usually concerned questioning the {qualifications} of actors to touch upon political issues, highlighting the continuing debate in regards to the duties and limitations of movie star affect.
-
Affect on Award Present Tradition
The usage of award exhibits as platforms for political statements has sparked debate in regards to the appropriateness of injecting politics into leisure. Some argue that award exhibits ought to stay solely centered on inventive achievement, whereas others contend that celebrities have a proper, or perhaps a accountability, to make use of their platform to deal with necessary social and political points. The dialogue surrounding De Niro’s feedback contributed to a broader examination of award present tradition and its evolving function in modern society. The long-term results could result in adjustments within the format or content material of those occasions, probably influencing future expressions of political opinions.
-
Promotion of Civic Engagement
Regardless of the potential for polarization, situations of movie star activism may also promote civic engagement by elevating consciousness of necessary points and inspiring dialogue. De Niro’s remarks, no matter particular person opinions about their content material or supply, served to focus consideration on the political local weather and encourage people to suppose critically about their very own beliefs and values. This heightened consciousness can translate into elevated voter turnout, participation in political advocacy teams, and a higher willingness to interact in constructive dialogue with these holding differing viewpoints. Such occasions can function a name to motion, prompting people to turn into extra knowledgeable and lively residents.
The societal affect discourse stemming from “robert de niro oscars trump” highlights the complicated interaction between movie star tradition, political expression, and public opinion. These incidents function recurring reminders of the highly effective function celebrities play in shaping the narrative and prompting ongoing conversations in regards to the relationship between leisure, politics, and civic accountability. The long-term penalties of those interactions stay a topic of ongoing debate and scholarly inquiry.
6. Free speech implications
The intersection of movie star expression, political commentary, and awards ceremonies invariably raises questions on free speech implications. Inspecting “robert de niro oscars trump” by means of this lens requires cautious consideration of the actor’s proper to specific his views, the restrictions imposed on that proper, and the potential penalties of exercising it.
-
The Proper to Categorical Political Opinions
In democratic societies, people usually possess the precise to specific their political beliefs with out worry of presidency censorship or reprisal. This proper extends to celebrities, together with Robert De Niro. His criticism of Trump, delivered through the Oscars, falls underneath the umbrella of protected speech. Nonetheless, this proper shouldn’t be absolute and could also be topic to sure limitations, akin to restrictions on defamation or incitement to violence. The authorized and moral boundaries of this proper are continually debated, significantly when exercised on distinguished platforms.
-
Limitations on Free Speech
Whereas free speech is a elementary proper, it’s not with out limitations. Defamation, incitement to violence, and the violation of mental property rights are examples of speech that could be restricted. Within the context of “robert de niro oscars trump,” the related limitations pertain primarily to the potential for defamation or incitement, though neither seems to have been credibly alleged. The core situation lies in balancing the actor’s proper to specific his views with the potential for these views to trigger hurt or disruption.
-
Penalties of Exercising Free Speech
Exercising the precise to free speech usually carries penalties, even when the speech is legally protected. People could face social ostracism, skilled repercussions, or public criticism for expressing unpopular or controversial views. De Niro’s outspoken criticism of Trump possible subjected him to such penalties, together with unfavourable media protection and potential boycotts of his movies. These penalties, whereas circuitously infringing on his proper to free speech, function a sensible deterrent for some people contemplating expressing their political beliefs.
-
The Platform and the Message
The platform on which speech is delivered considerably impacts its attain and potential penalties. An actor expressing political opinions throughout an internationally televised awards ceremony instructions a far higher viewers than the identical actor expressing these views in a personal setting. The amplified attain of the platform additionally magnifies the potential for each optimistic and unfavourable repercussions. This interaction between the platform and the message underscores the strategic concerns concerned in exercising free speech, significantly for public figures with vital affect.
The “robert de niro oscars trump” occasion gives a compelling case examine for analyzing the complexities of free speech within the context of movie star activism. The actor’s proper to specific his views, the restrictions imposed on that proper, the results of exercising it, and the function of the platform all contribute to a nuanced understanding of this elementary precept. The continuing debate surrounding this occasion highlights the enduring significance of defending free speech whereas additionally acknowledging its potential for hurt and the necessity for accountable expression.
7. Viewers response dynamics
The viewers response dynamics surrounding Robert De Niro’s remarks on the Oscars directed at Donald Trump characterize a fancy interaction of pre-existing political opinions, media framing, and the perceived appropriateness of utilizing an awards ceremony as a platform for political commentary. Understanding these dynamics necessitates an examination of the varied aspects shaping public response.
-
Segmented Responses Primarily based on Political Affiliation
Viewers reactions had been demonstrably segmented alongside political strains. Supporters of the focused particular person usually expressed outrage, accusing the actor of unprofessionalism and disrespect. Conversely, these essential of the focused particular person usually voiced help for the actor’s proper to specific his opinions, viewing his feedback as a type of resistance. This division underscores the extent to which political affiliation influences the interpretation of occasions involving public figures.
-
Affect of Media Framing
Media protection performed a big function in shaping viewers perceptions. Information shops and social media platforms framed the occasion in varied methods, emphasizing both the actor’s proper to free speech or the perceived inappropriateness of his actions. The tone and focus of media experiences influenced how audiences interpreted the occasion and, consequently, formed their reactions. For instance, a headline highlighting the actor’s “assault” on the focused particular person would possible elicit a distinct response than a headline emphasizing his “passionate protection of democratic values.”
-
Affect of the Platform Context
The context of the awards ceremony itself influenced viewers reactions. Some viewers felt that the Oscars, supposed as a celebration of inventive achievement, was not the suitable discussion board for political commentary. Others argued that celebrities have a accountability to make use of their platform to deal with necessary social and political points, whatever the setting. This debate highlights the continuing pressure between leisure and political expression and the differing expectations audiences maintain for public figures.
-
The Function of Social Media Amplification
Social media platforms served as echo chambers, amplifying current opinions and facilitating the speedy unfold of each optimistic and unfavourable reactions. Viral movies, memes, and hashtags additional intensified the discourse, contributing to a local weather of heightened polarization. The velocity and attain of social media allowed for rapid and widespread dissemination of opinions, making it troublesome to manage the narrative or promote balanced views.
In conclusion, viewers response dynamics to Robert De Niro’s statements had been formed by a confluence of things, together with pre-existing political opinions, media framing, the context of the awards ceremony, and the amplification results of social media. These dynamics underscore the complexities of public response to movie star activism and the challenges of navigating the intersection of leisure, politics, and public opinion.
8. Presidential response context
The presidential response context is integral to understanding the total scope of the “robert de niro oscars trump” occasion. It encompasses the political local weather on the time, the incumbent president’s typical modes of communication, and any particular pre-existing relationship or historical past between the president and the actor. The president’s response, or lack thereof, considerably influenced media protection, public discourse, and the perceived legitimacy of De Niro’s statements. For example, a direct, public rebuttal from the president would amplify the occasion’s political significance, whereas silence would possibly recommend a strategic resolution to reduce consideration or keep away from dignifying the criticism.
Contemplate earlier situations the place presidents have responded to criticism from celebrities. Some have used social media to immediately interact with detractors, whereas others have delegated responses to press secretaries or ignored the criticism completely. The character of the presidential response usually displays the administration’s broader communication technique and its evaluation of the potential affect of the criticism on public opinion. Within the case of “robert de niro oscars trump,” the presidential response, or the anticipation thereof, grew to become a vital aspect in shaping the narrative and influencing how the occasion was perceived by completely different segments of the inhabitants.
In abstract, the presidential response context shouldn’t be merely an ancillary element however a elementary element of the “robert de niro oscars trump” occasion. It gives essential insights into the political dynamics at play and the methods employed by the concerned events to handle public notion. Failing to think about this context would end in an incomplete and probably deceptive understanding of the occasion’s significance and its enduring legacy inside the broader panorama of movie star activism and political discourse.
9. Historic precedent comparisons
Inspecting historic precedents provides essential perspective on the “robert de niro oscars trump” occasion. By evaluating it to related situations of movie star activism and political commentary, it’s attainable to discern patterns, perceive the evolution of norms, and assess the importance of the incident inside a broader historic context.
-
Marlon Brando’s 1973 Oscars Protest
Marlon Brando’s refusal to simply accept his Oscar for “The Godfather” and his sending of Sacheen Littlefeather to learn a press release protesting the remedy of Native People gives a direct parallel. Each situations concerned utilizing the Oscars platform for political expression, though Brando’s protest centered on social injustice, whereas De Niro’s focused a particular political determine. These comparisons spotlight the enduring potential of award exhibits as websites of resistance and the willingness of some celebrities to danger their careers for his or her beliefs.
-
Jane Fonda’s Anti-Struggle Activism
Jane Fonda’s outspoken opposition to the Vietnam Struggle, together with her controversial go to to North Vietnam, serves as one other level of comparability. Whereas Fonda’s activism occurred exterior of an awards ceremony, it demonstrates the lengthy historical past of celebrities utilizing their platforms to voice political dissent. Each Fonda and De Niro confronted vital backlash for his or her views, illustrating the dangers related to taking controversial political stances, whatever the venue.
-
The Hollywood Blacklist Period
The Hollywood Blacklist period, throughout which actors, writers, and administrators had been denied employment based mostly on their alleged communist affiliations, provides a cautionary story in regards to the suppression of free speech. Whereas De Niro didn’t face official authorities censorship, the potential for skilled repercussions exists for celebrities who specific unpopular political opinions. Evaluating the “robert de niro oscars trump” occasion to the Blacklist period underscores the continuing pressure between inventive expression and political conformity inside the leisure trade.
-
Fashionable Celeb Endorsements
The prevalence of movie star endorsements in political campaigns gives a contrasting, but related, comparability. Whereas De Niro’s feedback had been essential relatively than supportive, they share the widespread thread of celebrities leveraging their fame to affect political discourse. These endorsements, starting from express help to refined messaging, spotlight the acknowledged energy of movie star affect in shaping public opinion and the continuing debate in regards to the ethics and effectiveness of such interventions.
These historic comparisons reveal that the “robert de niro oscars trump” occasion shouldn’t be an remoted incident, however relatively a part of a protracted custom of movie star activism and political expression. By analyzing these precedents, it turns into clearer that celebrities have traditionally used their platforms to advocate for social and political change, usually at appreciable private {and professional} danger. Understanding this historic context permits for a extra nuanced evaluation of the importance of De Niro’s actions and their potential affect on future political discourse.
Ceaselessly Requested Questions
This part addresses widespread inquiries concerning the incident involving Robert De Niro’s feedback on the Oscars regarding Donald Trump, offering factual context and clarifying potential misunderstandings.
Query 1: What particular remarks did Robert De Niro make on the Oscars associated to Donald Trump?
Whereas accepting an award, Robert De Niro criticized Donald Trump’s insurance policies and management fashion. The particular wording concerned robust disapproval, although precise phrases are extensively obtainable by means of information archives and video recordings of the occasion.
Query 2: Was the Academy of Movement Image Arts and Sciences conscious of De Niro’s deliberate feedback beforehand?
It’s extremely inconceivable that the Academy had prior data of the particular content material of De Niro’s remarks. Award acceptance speeches are usually unrehearsed, and the Academy usually refrains from censoring political expression.
Query 3: Did De Niro’s feedback violate any broadcast rules or legal guidelines?
De Niro’s feedback didn’t violate any recognized broadcast rules or legal guidelines regarding free speech. Whereas the Federal Communications Fee (FCC) regulates broadcast content material, political commentary usually falls underneath protected speech.
Query 4: What had been the rapid reactions to De Niro’s remarks from the general public and the media?
Reactions had been extremely polarized. Supporters of Donald Trump expressed outrage, whereas critics usually defended De Niro’s proper to free expression. Media protection different, with some shops specializing in the political implications and others on the appropriateness of the platform.
Query 5: Did De Niro face any skilled penalties on account of his statements?
Whereas particular skilled penalties are troublesome to definitively attribute, De Niro possible confronted elevated scrutiny and potential backlash from sure segments of the trade and the general public. Boycotts of his movies had been mentioned, although their precise affect is unquantifiable.
Query 6: How does this incident evaluate to different situations of political expression on the Oscars?
This incident aligns with a historic sample of political expression on the Oscars, relationship again to Marlon Brando’s protest in 1973. Whereas the particular targets and points differ, using the awards ceremony as a platform for political commentary stays a recurring phenomenon.
This FAQ highlights the important thing facets of the “robert de niro oscars trump” occasion, offering factual info and addressing potential misunderstandings. It underscores the complexities of movie star activism, free speech, and the intersection of leisure and politics.
The next part will discover the long-term ramifications and potential affect of this occasion on future political discourse.
Navigating the Intersection of Celeb, Politics, and Public Platforms
Following the controversy surrounding Robert De Niro’s remarks about Donald Trump on the Oscars, a number of key concerns emerge for public figures, organizations, and most of the people navigating related conditions.
Tip 1: Perceive the Platform’s Context. The Oscars, historically a celebration of inventive achievement, might not be perceived as probably the most acceptable venue for overtly political statements. Public figures ought to fastidiously take into account the viewers’s expectations and the potential for alienating viewers earlier than utilizing such platforms for political expression.
Tip 2: Anticipate Polarized Reactions. In an more and more divided political local weather, robust statements are more likely to provoke robust reactions. Public figures have to be ready for criticism, boycotts, and social media backlash, whatever the perceived validity of their views.
Tip 3: Train Accountable Freedom of Speech. Whereas freedom of speech is a elementary proper, it comes with accountability. Public figures ought to try for accuracy, keep away from private assaults, and take into account the potential penalties of their phrases earlier than talking out on controversial points.
Tip 4: Media Coaching and Disaster Communication. Organizations ought to be sure that their members have ample media coaching and entry to disaster communication sources. This may allow them to successfully handle public relations challenges and reply to criticism in a well timed {and professional} method.
Tip 5: Foster Civil Discourse. Encourage open and respectful dialogue, even when coping with opposing viewpoints. Promote essential pondering and discourage the unfold of misinformation. The purpose needs to be to foster understanding, relatively than merely successful arguments.
Tip 6: Contemplate the Lengthy-Time period Penalties. Actions have penalties, and public figures ought to weigh the potential long-term results of their statements on their careers, reputations, and relationships. Quick-term beneficial properties could not outweigh the long-term prices of alienating audiences or participating in contentious political debates.
Tip 7: Authenticity and Transparency. Make sure that any political stance taken is in keeping with the person’s publicly recognized values. Any deviation from anticipated norms needs to be clearly defined. Transparency builds belief, and authenticity is essential for sustaining credibility.
Tip 8: Be Ready for a Presidential Response. If concentrating on a sitting president, be prepared for a direct or oblique response. Issue the president’s typical communication fashion and techniques into the planning and messaging.
The following pointers emphasize the significance of cautious consideration, accountable communication, and strategic planning when navigating the complicated intersection of movie star, politics, and public platforms. Failure to heed these concerns can result in unfavourable penalties for all concerned.
The next part concludes this evaluation by summarizing the important thing takeaways from this occasion.
Conclusion
The evaluation of “robert de niro oscars trump” reveals the multifaceted nature of movie star activism and its affect on political discourse. The occasion underscores the enduring energy of public platforms to amplify messages, the polarizing results of political commentary, and the complicated interaction between freedom of speech and social accountability. Media protection considerably shapes public notion, highlighting the necessity for essential analysis of data sources.
This incident serves as a reminder of the growing intersection of leisure and politics, prompting ongoing reflection on the function of public figures in shaping societal values and influencing public opinion. Additional examination of such occasions is essential for understanding the evolving dynamics of political communication and its affect on democratic processes.
